Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure
State
Practice Department
Practice Area
Start Date
E.g., Sep, 2018
End Date
E.g., Sep, 2018
Keyword

Pages

Ohio Automobile Liability January 1, 2010
This action arises out of a motor vehicle accident where the defendant-driver's vehicle slid into the back of the victim's vehicle at an intersection. The parties stipulated that the driver's negligence caused the accident. The jury returned a..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
Delaware General Liability January 1, 2010
The case arose out of a rear-end automobile collision which allegedly caused personal injury to the plaintiff. The defendant engaged an expert to examine the plaintiff and to offer opinions at trial regarding the extent to which the automobile..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
New Jersey Fraud/Special Investigation January 1, 2010
An insurer does not have the right to take a credit as part of its reduction from a DRP's award for payment of fees that it made to the preferred provider organization because that payment was not the payment of a benefit to the injured party., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
Ohio Employment Law January 1, 2010
The syllabus of the Ohio Supreme Court decision in Bickers v. W. & S. Life Insurance Co., 116 Ohio St.3d 351, 2007 Ohio 6751, 879 N.E.2d 201 (2007), stated, in pertinent part, that "[a]n employee who is terminated from employment while..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
Federal Public Entity and Civil Rights Litigation January 1, 2010
The plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint against the defendants, a detective, an officer and a district attorney, claiming that his Fourth Shepardize, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights had been violated in connection with..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
New Jersey Automobile Liability January 1, 2010
This action stemmed from a motor vehicle accident in which the plaintiff’s vehicle was struck head-on by the defendant's. The jury found the defendant to have been negligent and awarded plaintiff $1 million for pain and suffering, $110,000..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
Federal Employment Law January 1, 2010
In Smith, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the but-for causation standard required by the United States Supreme Court in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. for age discrimination cases does not conflict with the continued use of..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
New Jersey Employment Law January 1, 2010
Three long-time female Seton Hall University Professors filed suit against the University alleging age and sex discrimination in pay in violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination ("NJLAD"). The trial court dismissed those allegations..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
Federal Intellectual Property, Technology and Media Litigation January 1, 2010
The California Court of Appeals recently ruled that the trial court did not err in deciding that a research company developing protein therapies for influenza was entitled to a protective order prohibiting discovery as a result of a plaintiff's..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
Federal Employment Law January 1, 2010
In Kelly, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld summary judgment in favor of the employer law firm in a former attorney's age discrimination lawsuit. There, the attorney alleged that his employment was terminated because he was "older..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010

Pages

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."