Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure
State
Practice Department
Practice Area
Start Date
E.g., 2017-03
End Date
E.g., 2017-03
Keyword

Pages

Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation January 3, 2017
The Appeal Board reversed the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s decision, concluding that Employer A’s joinder petition was not filed timely. According to the Board, the joinder petition should have been filed after the claimant gave..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
New Jersey Employment Law January 3, 2017
The plaintiff filed a race discrimination claim under Title VII, and Princeton moved to dismiss the claim based upon the plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies before the EEOC. The plaintiff had filed an EEOC Charge, but..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation January 3, 2017
Before the Workers’ Compensation Judge, the parties litigated the issue of whether there was concurrent compensation under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) or whether the Long Shore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
New Jersey Employment Law January 3, 2017
The plaintiff asserted a claim under the New Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA) after he was expelled from the volunteer fire company. The plaintiff alleged that his expulsion was in retaliation for his complaints to the county..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation January 3, 2017
On appeal to the Commonwealth Court, the employer argued that the Appeal Board was wrong to conclude that the claimant’s delay in deposing his expert was due to circumstances beyond his control. The employer further asserted that failure to..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
New Jersey Employment Law January 3, 2017
The plaintiffs—all disabled individuals assigned to the same jobsite—sought to assert claims against their employer and union for discriminatory compensation in violation of the ADA. They asserted that they were forced to pay more for..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation January 3, 2017
In his appeal to the Commonwealth Court, the claimant argued that the employer’s termination petition should not have been granted because the employer did not show a change in the claimant’s condition from a prior termination petition...., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
New Jersey Professional Liability January 3, 2017
The plaintiff, a state prisoner, claimed he was misdiagnosed by the medical staff of Rutgers University Correctional Healthcare, formerly part of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, which contracted with the state of New Jersey..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation January 3, 2017
The Commonwealth Court affirmed the decisions below, concluding that the claim petition was not timely filed. In doing so, they rejected the claimant’s argument that the legislature intended § 301(f)of the Act to be an extension of the..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Pennsylvania Asbestos and Mass Tort Litigation December 1, 2016
Edited by Timothy D. Rau, Esq. Cumulative Exposure Opinions Admissible Under Betz by Carolyn Schweizer On November 22, 2016, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued an opinion in Rost v.Ford Motor Company in which it declined to expand its..., The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific...

Pages

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."