Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

When a covered cause of loss combines with an excluded cause of loss, coverage will be found pursuant to the “concurring cause doctrine.”

January 3, 2017
Sebo v. American Home Assurance Company, Inc., 41 Fla. L. Weekly S582a

The Florida Supreme Court reversed the appellate court and concluded the insured homeowner was entitled to coverage under an “all-risk” homeowners policy after the home sustained damage from both construction defects and hurricane wind/water damage. While damages caused by construction defects were excluded under the policy, windstorm and water damage were covered. Agreeing with a prior decision from the Third District Court of Appeals, the Florida Supreme Court applied the “concurring cause doctrine” and rejected the insurer’s argument in favor of application of the “Efficient Proximate Cause” theory. Under the current cause doctrine, coverage exists “where an insured risk constitutes a concurrent cause of the loss even when it is not the prime or efficient cause.” See, Wallach v. Rosenberg, 527 So.2d 1386, 1387 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The Wallach court went on to state, “[t]he jury may find coverage where an insured risk constitutes a concurrent cause of the loss even where ‘the insured risk is not the prime or efficient cause of the accident.’”


Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Michael A. Packer
Co-Chair, Insurance Coverage/ Bad Faith Litigation Practice Group
(954) 847-4921

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."