Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

U.S. Supreme Court holds that the Securities Exchange Act does not block shareholders from bringing certain securities claims in state court.

January 3, 2017
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Manning, 136 S.Ct. 1562 (May 16, 2016)

Manning held over two million shares of stock in Escala Group, Inc. He claimed that he incurred losses when the share price decreased after Merrill Lynch allegedly devalued the shares through “naked short sales” of the stock. Manning and other shareholders filed a lawsuit in New Jersey state court, claiming that Merrill Lynch’s conduct violated state law; however, he did not assert any federal law claims. Merrill Lynch removed the case to federal court, arguing the case involved a federal question and that Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act grants exclusive jurisdiction to district courts for Manning’s claims. Utilizing the jurisdictional test from Section 1331 of the U.S. Code, which grants federal jurisdiction of civil actions “arising under” federal law, the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately upheld the remand of the case to state court. In reaching its decision, the Court reasoned that Manning’s “claims sought relief under state law and none necessarily raised a federal issue.”

 

Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."