Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Summary judgment warranted when alleged personal injury on commercial property due to maintenance hazard is based on conjecture that is not supported by actual evidence.

April 1, 2019
Edward v. Target Stores, Inc., No. 17-2646, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218739 (D.N.J. Jan. 9, 2019)

This case speaks to so many defense attorneys who are tasked with defending our clients against slip-and-fall plaintiffs who cannot articulate or prove the claimed “hazard” that purportedly caused their injuries. In this federal case out of the District of New Jersey, the plaintiff went shopping at several different stores prior to her arrival at Target, where she fell because she “stepped in something . . . it felt like glue or something.” The plaintiff did not identify an observable hazard nor did any witnesses. Target ultimately moved for summary judgment, arguing that proof of a fall, alone, does not bespeak negligence or the existence of a hazardous condition. Moreover, Target argued the fact that the plaintiff’s claim that she stepped in something does not amount to factual evidence, only mere conjecture. The court found these arguments persuasive, reasoning that the plaintiff could have picked up the “sticky substance” on her shoe in her travels long before she ever arrived at Target. No proof to the contrary was supplied. Summary judgment was granted in favor of the defendant.


Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2019

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2019 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Erica J. Goldring
(973) 618-4125

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."