Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Smoker responsible for own death.

January 1, 2012
Jerry Weingart v R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, et al; 50-2008CA038878XXXXMB

Philip Morris considered this their eighth win of 12 Engle cases to go to trial. The so-called Engle progeny cases are the offspring of plaintiffs once part of a class action that was decertified by the Florida Supreme Court. The former class members were allowed, however, a framework to proceed individually that included the ability to present as evidence the tobacco industry's history of deception in its marketing and official statements to government.

The defendant was able to sway a jury by proving a woman who smoked for 50 years had enough information that smoking is a health hazard. They produced media reports and public service commercials from the 1950s to the 1980s. Defense attorneys sought to establish that the public was aware of the danger. Jerry Weingart could not point to any advertising that persuaded his wife to continue smoking, and he did not know what prompted her to start. Weingart testified that he was a smoker, but he quit around 1970. He asked his wife to quit also, but she refused. Questioned whether he felt his decision was his responsibility, the jury was reminded that the husband acknowledged it was his responsibility alone to quit. "Yet, he brings this lawsuit. He wants to assign 65 percent responsibility to the tobacco companies. What's the difference?"

Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2012

Affiliated Attorney

Alex B. Norman
Associate
(215) 575-3563
abnorman@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Please read the following disclaimer:

Thank you for your interest in our firm. The information contained on this Website contains statements, videos and other content about the type and quality of services offered by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, as well as past results and testimonials about the firm. This information has not been reviewed nor approved by the Florida Bar.

  • The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and/or testimonials have been provided.
  • All results of cases handled by the firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
  • The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by any individual attorney or by the firm nor of the experience of all clients or others with the firm. Every case is different, and each client's case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.


Please acknowledge that you have read the above disclaimer by clicking on one of the two links below.

YES I have read and understand the above statements. I am interested in learning more about Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. NO I do not want to view the information.

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."