Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Retailer entitled to summary judgment because plaintiff failed to identify the cause of her fall.

April 1, 2017
Hoovis v. Grand City 99 Cents Store, Inc., 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 295, 2017 NY Slip Op 00292 (2d Dep’t 2017)

The appellate division held that a retailer was entitled to summary judgment because the plaintiff could not identify the cause of her fall without engaging in speculation. The defendant pointed to testimony from the plaintiff that she was not sure what she tripped on. The plaintiff’s counsel countered with testimony from the plaintiff and her daughter that she “must have” caught her foot on a box of water sticking out from a larger stack of water because she knew that her foot “hit something.” Ultimately, the court focused on the plaintiff’s testimony that she did not know what caused her fall, thereby disregarding the other testimony from the plaintiff that she assumed she must have tripped on the box of water.


Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Adam C. Calvert
(212) 376-6414

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."