Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Pennsylvania Superior Court affirms decision declining to award attorneys’ fees’ following jury’s finding that employer violated the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act.

July 1, 2017
Huyett v. Doug’s Family Pharm., 2017 Pa. Super. 115 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 20, 2017)

A jury awarded the plaintiff more than $20,000 in damages in connection with her claim that her former employer terminated her from a pharmacy technician position after it learned that she had been diagnosed with cancer, in violation of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act. Following trial, plaintiff’s counsel filed a fee petition, requesting more than $106,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs. The trial court, however, denied the petition, concluding that the evidence presented by the plaintiff at trial was “[‘w]eak’ and did not support a finding of a violation [of the PHRA].” On appeal, the plaintiff argued that “[t]he trial court was bound by the fact finder’s finding of discrimination, and that it lacked discretion to weigh the evidence and make its own independent determination of whether the PHRA was violated,” essentially asserting that “[a]ttorney fees are mandated or presumptively warranted when the plaintiff prevails.” The Superior Court, however, expressly disagreed with this assertion, noting that the language from the PHRA states, “The trial court may award attorney fees: where the plaintiff prevails and the trial court determines there has been a violation [of the statute]” (emphasis in original). In so finding, the court expressly noted that the issue was not whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a jury verdict, “[b]ut whether the trial court, after engaging in its own, permissible weighing of the evidence, concluded the defendant engaged in a discriminatory practice in violation of the PHRA for purposes of awarding attorney fees.” 


Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2017

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Lee C. Durivage
(215) 575-2584

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."