Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure; AD discrimination claim against health providers survives summary judgment.

July 1, 2017
Silva v. Baptist Health South Florida, No. 16-10094, ___ F.3d ___, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8151 (11th Cir. May 8, 2017)

The two plaintiffs, hearing-impaired individuals who treated at the defendants’ hospitals, alleged a violation of the ADA because the hospitals lacked auxiliary aids to ensure effective communication. The District Court entered summary judgment for the defendants because the record showed no evidence of a specific instance where hampered communication resulted in adverse consequences for medical care. Also, the plaintiffs failed to specify a specific matter that they did not comprehend. In addition, the District Court noted that the plaintiffs did not allege they would return to the hospitals in the future and, therefore, lacked standing to obtain prospective injunctive relief. The Eleventh Circuit reversed on all grounds, noting that the ADA requires aids for the hearing impaired. Their absence was a violation of the statute and, thus, deemed discrimination against the plaintiffs. The court held that the plaintiffs did have standing and also that, for an effective-communication claim, “We do not require a plaintiff to show actual deficient treatment or to recount exactly what the plaintiff did not understand. Nor is it a sufficient defense for a defendant merely to show that a plaintiff could participate in the most basic elements of a doctor-patient exchange. Rather, the relevant inquiry is whether the hospitals’ failure to offer an appropriate auxiliary aid impaired the patient’s ability to exchange medically relevant information with hospital staff.”

 

Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2017

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Shane Haselbarth
Shareholder
(215) 575-2639
sshaselbarth@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."