Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

In order to give expert medical testimony, the treating physician is in better position to express opinion as to cause and effect than the examining petitioner.

April 1, 2018
Staikos v. Fairview Board of Education, Docket No. A-0723-16T3, 2018 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 389 (App. Div., decided Feb. 21, 2018)

The Judge of Compensation discredited Dr. Halejian’s testimony (who evaluated the petitioner in anticipation of litigation) because it was based primarily on his review of records of other providers. However, it found Dr. Cole’s (with whom the claimant treated since his 2009 injury) credibility to be greatly enhanced because of his level of familiarity with the petitioner’s care, achieved during their lengthy treating relationship. The judge granted the petitioner’s motion and awarded him medical and temporary benefits. This appeal ensued.

In affirming the judge’s holding, the Appellate Division relied on DeVito v. Mullen’s Roofing Co., 72 N.J. Super. 233 (App. Div., 1962), where the court held, “It is generally recognized that a treating physician is in a better position to express an opinion as to cause and effect than one making an examination in order to give expert medical testimony.” Accordingly, the Appellate Division found sufficient credible evidence to support the Judge of Compensation’s ruling.

 

Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2018

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2018 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Dario J. Badalamenti
Shareholder
(973) 618-4122
djbadalamenti@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."