Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Notice provision of N.J.S.A. 34:15-40(f) requires insurance carrier to seek permission from injured worker before initiating third-party action on his behalf.

April 1, 2017
Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Salimente, Docket No. A-3687-14T2, 2017 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 275 (App. Div., decided Feb. 6, 2017)

Mr. Mishkoff, an employee of Credit Card Processing US, was involved in a work-related motor vehicle accident when his car was hit by Ms. Salimente. The workers’ compensation carrier for Credit Card Processing, Hartford, made medical and indemnity payments to and on behalf of Mishkoff. When Mishkoff failed to bring suit against Salimente, Hartford filed its own complaint against her on the last day of the two-year statute of limitations. Salimente moved to dismiss the complaint on the basis that the insurer failed to plead it had obtained Mishkoff’s permission to file the suit pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-40(f). Concluding that Hartford had not given Mishkoff the required notice and the running of the statute made cure impossible, the judge dismissed Hartford’s claim. In reversing and remanding the judge’s dismissal, the Appellate Division cited Poetz v. Mix, 7 N.J. 436 (1951), in which the Supreme Court held that the ten-day written demand can be waived, especially where the carrier’s action preserves the subrogor’s right of action against the tortfeasor. The Appellate Division concluded that, as a filing on the last day of the limitations period suggests that Hartford was preserving not only its own subrogation claim but also Mishkoff’s right of action against Salimente, the plaintiff’s complaint should not have been dismissed before discovery could be had as to whether Mishkoff waived his right to the ten-day notice.


Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Dario J. Badalamenti
(973) 618-4122

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."