Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

No summary judgment where there is a disputed issue of material fact as to insured’s legal obligation to pay claim.

January 6, 2015
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Manzo-Pianelli, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18082 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2014)

This action concerned whether an insurer owed coverage to Manzo-Pianelli, who was involved in an automobile accident with the permissive driver of the insured’s vehicle. The insured had an insurance policy with State Farm and an umbrella policy with Allstate. State Farm tendered its policy limits to Manzo-Pianelli, but Allstate denied coverage, arguing that (1) the policy language limited coverage to “damages which an insured person becomes legally obligated to pay” and (2) the insured, who was not named as a defendant, could not be legally obligated to pay damages because the statute of limitations had run. Manzo-Pianelli filed a complaint against her insurer, USAA, for underinsured motorist benefits. USAA filed a third party complaint against Allstate, Manzo-Pianelli and the permissive driver of the insured vehicle. The trial court found that the permissive driver was an omnibus insured and that she was covered under the Allstate policy as a permissive user or, in the alternative, that her actions were covered because her negligence would be imputed to the insured under the vicarious liability and dangerous instrumentality doctrines. This court found that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Manzo-Pianelli as there was a material issue of fact as to whether the insured was, or could ever be, legally obligated to pay the permissive driver’s claim.

Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2015

Affiliated Attorney

Dana A. Gittleman
Associate
(267) 519-6597
DAGittleman@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."