Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

IP Claims Quarterly

December 4, 2017
Presented by the Technology, Media and Intellectual Property Litigation Practice Group

Edited by David J. Shannon, Esq.

Despite the Smell, No Counterfeiting Found in Perfume Trademark Infringement Case

 

A New York federal judge recently found in favor of Coty, Inc., the producer of high-quality perfumes associated with Calvin Klein, Vera Wang and Lady Gaga, against Excell Brands, a well-known copycat fragrance company. While the court concluded that Excell's knock-off fragrances infringed on Coty's trademarks, the court—unfortunately—did not find the company liable for counterfeiting. Therefore, Coty was entitled only to injunctive relief and Excell's profits on the products at issue. Coty could not recover enhanced monetary relief. The court also denied the company's claims for attorney fees and prejudgment interest. 

Excell Brands had been creating and selling knock-off fragrances, including Eternity and Serenity by Calvin Klein. The bottles and packaging were designed to mimic the famous trademarks. The court found that Excell's entire business model was based on copying Coty's distinctive and well-known trademarks. In many instances, Excell used the phrase "Our Version Of" the plaintiff's fragrances on the copycat brand packaging. 

Despite these facts, the court did not find actual counterfeiting. Therefore, no award of enhanced damages was allowed. The court also did not consider the matter "exceptional," so Coty could not recover its attorney fees or prejudgment interest. The court's decision demonstrates the high bar a plaintiff must overcome to be awarded enhanced damages and attorney fees.

The Lanham Act provides that a court can award reasonable attorney fees and prejudgment interest to a prevailing party in "exceptional" cases, which have been defined to involve fraud, bad faith or willfulness. However, the mere finding of bad faith does not automatically entitle a party to attorney fees. This District Court, in fact, noted that courts routinely decline to award attorney fees in cases involving willful infringement.   

Defendants routinely receive demands in trademark infringement matters that include potential attorney fees, interest and enhanced damages. This case is an excellent example of the courts' reluctance—even in an almost airtight infringement matter—to award these type of damages unless truly "exceptional" circumstances are found. 

The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. We welcome the opportunity to provide such legal assistance as you require on this and other subjects. To be removed from our list of subscribers who receive this complimentary newsletter, please contact djshannon@mdwcg.com. If however you continue to receive the alerts in error, please send a note to djshannon@mdwcg.com.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1           
 © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Affiliated Attorney

David J. Shannon
Chair, Privacy and Data Security
(215) 575-2615
djshannon@mdwcg.com
David W. Henry
Shareholder
(407) 420-4418
dwhenry@mdwcg.com
Dante C. Rohr
Shareholder
(856) 414-6412
dcrohr@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."