Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Fifth District Court of Appeal certifies question to Florida Supreme Court regarding disparate treatment of discoverability of financial relationship with experts.

April 1, 2019
Younkin v. Blackwelder, Opinion Filed Febr. 22, 2019 by Fifth District Court of Appeals of Florida

The Fifth District Court of Appeal certified the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as one of great public importance: Whether the analysis and decision in Worley should also apply to preclude a defense law firm that is not a party to the litigation from having to disclose its financial relationship with experts it retains for purposes of litigation including those that perform compulsory medical examinations under Florida Rule Of Civil Procedure 1.360?

The petitioner appealed a discovery order entered by the trial court compelling defense counsel and defense counsel’s law firm to disclose the number of times it had retained its expert witness and how much they paid him over the past three years. The Fifth District denied certiorari review as it was not a departure from the essential requirements of law. In Vazquez v. Martinez, 175 So. 3d 372, 373-74 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015), this type of financial information is discoverable “to assist counsel in impeaching examining physicians and other experts by demonstrating that the expert has economic ties to the insurance company or defense law firm.” On the other hand, the Florida Supreme Court in Worley v. Central Florida Young Men’s Christian Ass’n, 228 So. 3d 18 (Fla. 2017) protected a plaintiff from disclosing whether an attorney referred him to a doctor for treatment or a law firm from producing documents related to a possible referral relationship between the law firm and the physician, arguing that it violated attorney-client privilege. Acknowledging that the current state of the law treats litigants unequally, this issue was certified to the Florida Supreme Court for their opinion.

 

Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2019

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2019 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Catherine Norris
Associate
(407) 505-4677
cbnorris@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."