Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Extent of conduct needed to establish a public accommodation hostile work environment claim.

July 1, 2017
Holmes v. Jersey City Police Department, A-1634-15T3 (App. Div., Apr. 27, 2017)

In a published opinion, the Appellate Division reversed the dismissal of a complaint alleging public accommodation discrimination after finding that the trial court applied an overly restrictive standard for the cause of action. The plaintiff alleged that after being arrested, he was subjected to discrimination because of his gender status. The trial court concluded that the rude and insensitive comments allegedly made by the police officers did not rise to the level of being severe and pervasive to sustain an LAD violation. In overruling this decision, the Appellate Court concluded that, conduct that may not suffice to state a hostile work environment claim in the employment context could still give rise to an LAD violation when a public accommodation claim was being asserted. In fact, a single offensive comment may suffice.

 

Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2017

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Lawrence B. Berg
Shareholder
(856) 414-6031
lbberg@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."