Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Expert testimony necessary for jury to consider whether bar stool is defective. Daubert motion granted to exclude medical expert who did not consider other injuries.

April 1, 2017
Vincent v. Harrington Raceway, Inc. v. Olsen, No. K14C-05-013 RBY, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 58 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 7, 2017)

The plaintiff was injured on the defendant’s property when another person fell on top of her, apparently because the chair portion of the person’s bar stool separated from the seat portion. The plaintiff did not retain a liability expert, and the defendant moved in limine to exclude evidence that the bar stool was defective. The court granted the motion, holding that “[p]roof regarding the dangerous nature of [a bar stool] requires expert testimony, since such proof is outside the ordinary knowledge of a layperson,” even though people are generally familiar with bar stools. The court also held that one of the plaintiff’s two medical experts could not testify at trial because the doctor did not consider that the plaintiff had broken his hand three months after the initial injury and, therefore, “[f]ailed to show basic awareness of another possible cause of plaintiff’s alleged injuries.” The court explained that the doctor’s opinion on causation lacked “[t]he reliability that is the hallmark of admissible expert testimony” under Rule 702.

 

Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Jessica L. Tyler
Associate
(302) 552-4370
JLTyler@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."