Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Defendant fails to rebut plaintiff's prima facie evidence of negligence where defendant rear-ended a stopped vehicle in heavy traffic, even though defendant was only driving five miles per hour.

January 1, 2010
Musharbash v. Duran, 22054/07 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 21, 2009) (Scheinkman, J.)

The plaintiffs sought to recover damages for personal injuries they allegedly sustained due to a motor vehicle accident where the defendant rear-ended the plaintiff's vehicle. The court ruled a rear-end collision with a stopped vehicle established prima face negligence by the driver of the following vehicle. At the time of the accident, the defendant's vehicle was moving approximately five miles per hour, and he had his foot on the brake. However, "[e]vidence of a 'sudden stop' in heavy traffic is insufficient to rebut the inference of defendant's negligence since defendant should have anticipated that cars ahead of her would come to a stop."

Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010

Affiliated Attorney

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."