Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Court finds no “ascertainable loss” where cost to complete does not exceed contract price.

April 1, 2012
Ulokameje, et. al. v. Content, et. al, Docket No. A-3664-10T1 (Decided January 11, 2012)

In a recent unreported decision from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, the court upheld the trial judge’s finding that the breach of contract claims of both the homeowner and the contractor should be dismissed, as should the homeowner’s claims under the Consumer Fraud Act. The court found that approximately 70% of the work had been completed and that the contractor had been paid about 70% of the contract amount. In addition, the homeowner failed to prove that the cost to complete the project with a different contractor exceeded the total cost of the original contract. In light of those findings, the court found no breach of contract and no ascertainable loss. Due to the lack of ascertainable loss, there was found to be no Consumer Fraud Act claim.

Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2012

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."