Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Conferring jurisdiction to Pennsylvania authorities under the Act for injury occurring in New Jersey.

April 1, 2019
Zachary Kreschollek v. WCAB (Commodore Maintenance Corp); 297 C.D. 2018; filed Jan. 7, 2019; by Judge McCullough

The employer was a subcontractor for the Delaware River Port Authority. The claimant, a Philadelphia resident, was hired out of his local union hall. On the date of the injury, the claimant had been working on both the Pennsylvania and New Jersey sides of the bridge. While working on the ground underneath the PATCO rail line on the New Jersey side, the claimant was injured. The employer accepted a New Jersey workers’ compensation claim and paid benefits to the claimant under New Jersey law. Later, the claimant filed a claim petition in Pennsylvania. The employer raised a jurisdictional defense since the claimant was injured in New Jersey, not Pennsylvania.

On appeal to the Commonwealth Court, the claimant argued that both Pennsylvania and New Jersey jointly owned the bridge as well as adjacent land and structures. Therefore, any injury on the joint territory occurs in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey. The court analyzed the joint compact entered into between Pennsylvania and New Jersey and noted that it did not make any reference to jurisdiction for purposes of workers’ compensation claims, let alone confer jurisdiction to Pennsylvania authorities under the Act for injuries occurring in New Jersey. According to the court, the claimant’s injury simply did not occur in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Therefore, under § 101 of the Act, the claim was not compensable. In addition, the court said that the § 305.2 extraterritorial provisions of the Act did not apply. The court affirmed the decisions below and dismissed the claimant’s appeal.


Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2019

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2019 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Francis X. Wickersham
(610) 354-8263

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."