Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Commonwealth Court clarifies that a utilization review challenge to physical therapy treatment need not name each individual therapist who provides treatment.

July 1, 2010
MV Transportation v. WCAB (Harrington), (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010); No. 974 C.D. 2009; filed February 25, 2010; by Judge Leavitt

Since the decisions in Schenck v. WCAB (Ford Electronics), 937 A.2d 1156 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007), and Bucks County Community College v. WCAB (Nemes), 918 A.2d 150 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007), employers have been faced with the challenge that a utilization review request must be provider-specific and does not apply to treatment rendered by providers other than the one named. In this case, the Commonwealth Court has identified an exception to that principle in the case of physical therapy treatment. Recognizing that physical therapy treatment is prescribed by a physician and may be carried out by different therapists, the court found that it is not reasonable to require an employer to name each individual therapist as a "provider." Likewise, separate UR challenges to the same course of therapy could lead to inconsistent results as to its reasonableness and necessity. In MTV Transportation, the court held that when making a UR request for physical therapy prescribed by a doctor and administered in that doctor's facility, the employer must name the doctor prescribing the physical therapy and the facility where the claimant receives that therapy. The court noted, however, that there might be cases where the challenge is to the physical therapist's treatment itself rather than the doctor's prescription of it. Likewise, the court's rationale should apply to physical therapy not provided at the doctor's facility. This holding is significant as it allows a single UR challenge to physical therapy treatment rather than multiple reviews of treatment from different therapists.

Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010

Affiliated Attorney

Francis X. Wickersham
(610) 354-8263
G. Jay Habas
Managing Attorney, Erie, PA Office
(814) 480-7802

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."