Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Claimant hired for harvest season is itinerant agricultural laborer, not seasonal employee, and entitled to higher average weekly wage and compensation rate.

July 1, 2017
Toigo Orchards, LLC and Nationwide Insurance Company v. WCAB (Gaffney), No. 722 C.D. 2016; Filed Mar. 13, 2017; Judge Cohn-Jubelirer

The Commonwealth Court agreed that the claimant was not a seasonal employee. They concurred with the Appeal Board that the claimant was an itinerant farm laborer, who could travel from state to state to harvest crops or engage in other related work. The court also pointed out that the claimant did not have a contract prohibiting him from finding work as a laborer somewhere else. Additionally, the court agreed with the Board’s average weekly wage calculation given that it fairly addressed the claimant’s earnings when he was actually working and advanced the humanitarian purpose of the Act, as well as the purpose of Section 309, by accurately capturing the claimant’s economic reality. In the court’s view, Section 309(d.1) of the Act did not apply, since that section was intended to govern long-term employment relationships, and Section 309(d.2) did not reflect the claimant’s economic reality. Finally, the court did reverse the Board’s award of a healing period to the claimant because the employer presented evidence that the claimant was retired, and collecting Social Security Retirement Benefits both prior to and after his work with the employer, and had no intention of returning to work after his injury. For this reason, the claimant did not require a period for healing.


Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2017

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Francis X. Wickersham
(610) 354-8263

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."