Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Beekeeper gets “stung” in court.

October 1, 2017
Sanders v. Odilia’s Express, Inc., 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 317 (Del. Super. Ct. Jun. 23, 2017)

After a tractor-trailer carrying approximately 400 beehives overturned on I-95 in Delaware, a beekeeper and his fellow employees arrived on scene to recollect the bees. Unfortunately, the plaintiff was stung multiple times. As a result, he developed a permanent venom allergy, requiring him to quit the profession. He sued all the defendants involved in hiring or operating the overturned tractor-trailer. They, in turn, filed for summary judgment on the basis that the beekeeper expressly consented to the risks of the activity. The plaintiff testified that he understood the risk of being stung, wore additional protective clothing, and continued working even after being continuously stung. Nonetheless, the beekeeper argued that he did not give express consent to relieve the defendants of their obligation of care. The court granted the defendants’ motion, holding that Delaware’s “primary assumption of the risk” doctrine was met and, as a professional beekeeper, the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk of multiple bee stings.

Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Jessica L. Tyler
Associate
(302) 552-4370
JLTyler@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."