An arbitration clause signed by the parent for a minor child is found not enforceable without clear language as to what is being waived.

A waiver requiring submission to arbitration was found enforceable by the trial court but unenforceable by the Superior Court. The Superior Court found enforceability was a matter of law and, although the waiver clearly referred to waiver of a trial, there was no “clear and unambiguous statement that the person signing the Agreement is waiving [his] right to sue or go to court to secure relief.” Due to no reference in the clause to a court or jury, or an explanation of how arbitration differed from a proceeding in a court of law, the court found the agreement was not so clear as to require the plaintiff to give up his rights to bring his claim in the court.

^{_{Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2017. Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2017 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.}}