Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

The 1st District Court of Appeal rules that statute of limitations was not tolled by fusion hardware.

July 1, 2018
Ring Power Corp. and USIS v. Andrew Murphy, No. 1D17-1316, 1st DCA Fla., Decision date Feb. 23, 2018

The claimant had a fusion surgery a few months after his 2006 work injury. Within one year of surgery, the fusion was solid, and it was argued that they no longer performed any fuction, although they remained attached and inside of the claimant. The employer last provided benefits in 2013. In 2016, the claimant filed a petition for benefits, and the employer asserted a statute of limitations defense.

The claimant cited Section 440.19(2), which states that the time period is tolled “for a period of one year from the payment of compensation or furnishing of remedial treatment.” The claimant further cited Gore v. Lee County School Board, 43 So. 3d at 849, where the 1st DCA held that the “continued use” of a medical apparatus will toll the statute of limitations. That case involved a claimant who used a knee prosthesis, which the court opined counted as continual, remedial treatment. The Judge of Compensation Claims agreed with the claimant and held that the statute of limitations was tolled due to the fusion hardware.

On appeal, the 1st DCA said that Gore does not apply here because the claimant was not “using” the rods and screws. According to the court, the “rods and screws were used for a temporary purpose, but for years they have served no function at all. Therefore, their placement does not toll the statute of limitations.”


Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2018

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2018 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

Linda Wagner Farrell
(904) 358-4224

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."