Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

“Split in authority” makes federal court the preferred forum for defending a UTPCPL claim.

April 1, 2019
McDonough v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., No. 5:18-cv-02247, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19806, at *3 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2019)

The plaintiff filed suit alleging violations of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL), among other counts. The defendant moved to dismiss the UTPCPL claim, arguing the economic loss doctrine barred recovery under the UTPCPL. In granting the defendant’s request to dismiss the count, the Eastern District acknowledged that the motion would likely have been denied at the state-court level. Judge Leeson cited a “split in authority” on the issue, whereby federal courts interpret Pennsylvania law as barring recovery under the doctrine, while intermediate appellate state courts have recently ruled the exact opposite. Until the Pennsylvania Supreme Court formally weighs in, a defendant is much more likely to defeat a UTPCPL claim at the pleading stage in a federal forum.

 

Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2019

Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2019 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

Affiliated Attorney

James P. Shay
Associate
(215) 575-4555
JPShay@mdwcg.com

Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."